ANSI/AGMA A Gear Classification and Inspection Handbook – Tolerances and Measuring Methods for Unassembled Spur and Helical Gears ( including. 2 Aug Credit line should read Extractedfrom AGMA Standard A88, Gear Classificationandhspection Handbook,Tolerances Measuring and. Please Consensus on this matter Customer Engineering Drawing Gear Tab Block Gear Data Specifies AGMA Q8 # Teeth Diametral Pitch.
|Published (Last):||23 January 2007|
|PDF File Size:||20.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.85 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
We have no amendments or corrections for this standard.
There is some sort of feeling that people want standards about this, but quite frankly there is absolutly no guidance given by Afma on how to use them because they really dont want to tell people what to put on thier drawings. For certain if you need to control a special element of the standard, it should be specified.
To the running of this website, we need your help to support agms. This is a very very very very good question that you all should put to AGMA. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. The Ag,a only deals with the variations on the base gear dimensions but not the base dimensions.
Further to this, it may be easier to meet Q10 on tooth to tooth error than composite, or on Lead then on Profile. It is mainly based on it but with some differences.
All materials on our website are shared by users. I mainly use fine pitch gears therefore, I always use the composite method because it takes all the factors of tooth and gear variations in one wgma test which make it easier, cheaper, and faster.
If you have many parts and you can afford a master 2000-z88, you are probably better off using the tce check method. Close this window and log in. Therefore, if the gear has teeth for example, you need to do 50 tests for each gear to get the TTCE and the TCE which is a time consuming process. Such issues are the result of project complexity, size, uniqueness and regulation, as well as the need for virtual team collaboration.
2000-a888 Alert Profile lists the documents that will be monitored. A class 8 gear generally permits element or composite methods. McVittie Gear Engineers, Inc.
AGMA Apdf – Documents
Kappel Arrow Gear H. The current AGMA qgma are: Tuesday May 19, Register now while it’s still free! Already Subscribed to this document. You can download and open this file to your own computer 2000-88 DRM prevents opening this file on another computer, including a networked server.
Even though the manufacturer can select the measuring method as you mentioned, the gear has to conform to all AGMA requirements. If you insist on the dimensions over pins then you have to measure all the teeth. I would prefer the tce method as it probably gives you a better feel as to how it would mate with its pinion in the application. The Architecture, Engineering and Construction AEC industry is constantly looking for process improvements agmz better manage potential project delays and costs.
That is why AGMA in all of these standards also clearly spells out that you need not specify a single agmz class for each paramater. To calculate the maximum dimension over pins you had to use the TTCE, the tooth thickness tolerance Y and tooth thinning to achieve minimum backlash.
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. Trapp Klingelnberg Soehne R.
AGMA ANSI/AGMA 2000-A88 – Gear Classification and Inspection Handbook:…
Hamilton Wallace Murray G. Porter Illinois Tool Works V. My suggestion is that you make your frustrations known to AGMA 2000-x88 sending them an email outlining your frustrations. What most people also do not realize but is clearly spelled out in all of these standards is that there is no “magic” co-relation between the specified tolerances of a given quality class. If you or your customer are ISO or ASI believe you are required to use the latest version of a particular spec.
It’s easy to join and agmq free. AGMA only requires total composite and tooth to tooth composite to be measured. The standards were developed to allow for use of nice linear equations as opposed to comply with a particular manufacturing process or part application. Join your peers on the Internet’s largest technical engineering professional community. These changes, discovered after publication, have been made in thisprinting, as shown below: